Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Gay marriage parade participants spit on priest.

By Todd Starnes

Published June 29, 2015

FoxNews.com

How do the ultra left gay crazies justify spitting on a priest ?

We already know many on the far Left hate religion and all its symbols, but this is too much.

So much for gay " tolerance ", which has been shown to be total bs, as there is NO tolerance in the " gay community " for opposing views.

Father Morris may be forgiving, but such acts are NOT worthy of forgiveness. There are too many of these types of events going on by the ever so intolerant left. - TGFP.

There were g-strings galore at Gay Pride celebrations across the fruited plain as scantily-clad celebrants took to the streets to herald the Supreme Court’s decision to redefine marriage.

Supporters of LGBTQI and A marriages waved rainbow-colored flags from San Francisco to New York City.

Unfortunately – the festivities in the Big Apple turned ugly.

Instead of responding with anger Father Jonathan responded with grace.ather Jonathan Morris – was walking near Broadway — wearing his cleric’s collar – when he stumbled up the Gay Pride Parade.
Father Jonathan, who is also a Fox News contributor, tweeted what happened:
“Two men walked by and spat on me,” he wrote.

Related Image

Expand / Contract

They spit on a priest!
What kind of a person hurls their sputum at a priest? What kind of a human being does that?
But instead of responding with anger Father Jonathan responded with grace.
“The two men who spat on me are probably very good man (sic) caught up in excitement and past resentment,” he wrote. “Most in that parade would not do that.”
He dismissed their act of ugliness as simply being caught up in the moment.
“Oh well, I deserve worse,” he wrote.
In a way it’s a modern-day parable – those who preach tolerance are the least tolerant of all.
But Father Jonathan demonstrated that he not only preaches tolerance – he practices it.
A lesson for us all.

Monday, June 29, 2015

Supreme Court rules against EPA and O'buma's anti coal regulations.

Nice to see O'buma get defeated in court for a change.
If only they had done this on gay marriage and O'bumacare, but that would have been too much to expect. - TGFP.

Published June 29, 2015

FoxNews.com

In a major win for the energy industry, the Supreme Court ruled Monday against the Environmental Protection Agency's effort to limit certain power plant emissions -- saying the agency "unreasonably" failed to consider the cost of the regulations.

The rules curbing emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants began to take effect in April. But the court said by a 5-4 vote Monday that the EPA failed to take their cost into account when the agency first decided to regulate the toxic emissions from coal- and oil-fired plants.
The challenge was brought by industry groups and 21 Republican-led states.
Writing for the court, Justice Antonin Scalia said it is not appropriate to impose billions of dollars of economic costs in return for a few dollars in health or environmental benefits.
"EPA must consider cost -- including cost of compliance -- before deciding whether regulation is appropriate and necessary," the court said.
The case now goes back to lower courts for the EPA to decide how to account for costs.
The decision is a blow to the Obama administration, just days after the court delivered President Obama a major win by upholding his signature health care overhaul. The White House also celebrated Friday's historic ruling legalizing gay marriage nationwide.
In the majority opinion on Monday, Scalia wrote that while the EPA decided to regulate power plants to improve public health and the environment, even the agency estimated it would cost power plants nearly $10 billion a year. "EPA refused to consider whether the costs of its decision outweighed the benefits. The Agency gave cost no thought at all, because it considered cost irrelevant to its initial decision to regulate," Scalia wrote.
In this, he wrote that the EPA over-reached.
The EPA did factor in costs at a later stage when it wrote standards that are expected to reduce the toxic emissions by 90 percent. They were supposed to be fully in place next year. The issue was whether health risks are the only consideration under the Clean Air Act.
The EPA said in a statement it would review the decision and take "any appropriate next steps" when the review is complete. "EPA is disappointed that the Court did not uphold the rule, but this rule was issued more than three years ago, investments have been made and most plants are already well on their way to compliance," EPA Press Secretary Melissa J. Harrison said.
She said that since the decision pertained to cost considerations -- and not the agency's overall Clean Air Act authority -- "EPA remains committed to ensuring that appropriate standards are in place" to curb air pollution.
"The Court's decision focuses on EPA's initial finding that it was appropriate and necessary to regulate these emissions and not on the substance of the standards themselves," she said, adding that for every dollar spent on reducing pollution under these rules, "the American public would see up to $9 in health benefits."
But Republicans cheered the decision. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, chairwoman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said in a statement she hopes the opinion leads to some "balance" in these environmental standards. "It is heartening to hear that the court has reined in the EPA, especially on the issue of the costs of regulation," she said.
Scalia was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan said it was enough that the EPA considered costs at later stages of the process.
"Over more than a decade, EPA took costs into account at multiple stages and through multiple means as it set emissions limits for power plants," Kagan said.
She was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.
The case is the latest in a string of attacks against the administration's actions to use the Clean Air Act to rein in pollution from coal-burning power plants.
EPA is readying rules expected to be released sometime this summer aimed at curbing pollution from the plants that is linked to global warming. States have already challenged those rules even before they are final, and Congress is working on a bill that would allow states to opt out of any rules clamping down on heat-trapping carbon dioxide.
The legal and political challenges ahead could undermine U.S. efforts to inspire other countries to control their emissions, as they head into negotiations in Paris on a new international treaty later this year.
In the case of mercury, the costs of installing and operating equipment to remove the pollutants before they are dispersed into the air are hefty -- $9.6 billion a year, the EPA found.
But the benefits are much greater, $37 billion to $90 billion annually, the agency said. The savings stem from the prevention of up to 11,000 deaths, 4,700 nonfatal heart attacks and 540,000 lost days of work, the EPA said. Mercury accumulates in fish and is especially dangerous to pregnant or breastfeeding women, and young children, because of concern that too much could harm a developing brain.
A disproportionate share of the 600 affected power plants, most of which burn coal, are in the South and upper Midwest.

Art Bell Midnight in the Desert Trailer 5 (UFOs)

Art Bell Midnight in the Desert Trailer 6 (Ghosts)

Cows have sex during live tv news segment.

The Huffington Post | By Ron Dicker

Posted: 06/25/2015 1:49 pm EDT Updated: 06/25/2015 2:59 pm EDT

Guess they were in the moo-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-d.
Some cattle got down to barnyard boinking during a live news segment on dairy farms by Oklahoma City's Fox 25 reporter Mitch English.
English didn't let the tee-hee moment pass, quipping, "Hey, we gotta make cattle, we gotta make some beef!"

He later took to Twitter for more bovine nooky jokes:

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Giant penis sprays people in safe sex campaign stunt. Video.

15:16, 24 June 2015
By Kirstie McCrum

What was meant to be a fun safe sex campaign to spread information about STDs has been branded "banal and idiotic"

People are outraged after a student launched a controversial ad campaign by dressing up as a giant penis.

Philip van Eck was hired by a charity who works with sex education in the city of Sandefjord, Norway, to promote the use of condoms.
The 19-year-old student's bizarre stunt including sneaking up on people and spraying them with golden confetti.
The tagline “Tiss kan overraske” means either "Penis" or "urine" "can surprise you".

People over 30 were offended by the outrageous campaign, despite younger consumers finding it amusing.
Philip, who got the job because he is 6ft 4in and fitted the suit perfectly said: "I thought it was hilarious. If I can do a good thing for others, just by being a d***, there is nothing better.
"The filming was not unproblematic, as passers-by wanted selfies with the giant penis.
"Suddenly, lots of people wanted to touch the penis and take pictures with the penis. I almost felt harassed."

The campaign for sex education charity RFSU was launched after statistics revealed that almost 23,000 Norwegians contract chlamydia every year.
Yet despite the high STD infection rate Norwegians use fewer condoms than lovers in Sweden, Denmark and Finland.
Pernille Berg of the Involve! advertising agency, who produced a video for the campaign, said: "Sex should be fun, exciting and a little naughty. We wanted the campaign to reflect that.
"The campaign mostly found favour, and people understood the humour in our message, although many, especially those over 30, thought the campaign was pointless and some went so far as to brand it banal and idiotic."

NYC Bee Swarm Attack, 44th b/t Vanderbilt and 5th

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Midnight in the Desert Art Bell Fan Trailer

Friday, June 19, 2015

Lake fire burns 10,000 acres in San Bernardino, structures threatened, evaculations ordered.

Lake Fire Burns 10,000 Acres in San Bernardino Mountains; Structures Threatened, Evacuations Ordered

Posted 5:08 AM, June 18, 2015, by Tracy Bloom, Mark Mester, Chris Wolfe and Melissa Pamer, Updated at 10:19pm, June 18, 2015

Videos in link.

A rapidly growing wildfire in the San Bernardino Mountains south of Big Bear Lake burned just over 15.6 square miles and prompted mandatory evacuations on Thursday, authorities said.The so-called “Lake Fire” was reported Wednesday around 4 p.m. and was burning east of Camp De Benneville Pines south of Jenks Lane Road (map), according to the InciWeb, a multi-agency website that provides updated information on large fires on federal land.

Smoke was towering over the San Bernardino National Forest’s Barton Flats Visitor Center, where a fire command post was set up.

“It’s extremely steep, treacherous terrain up there. It’s up in the wilderness. There’s lots of down and dead fuel, vegetation,” said Brian Grant of the U.S. Forest Service. “There’s a lot of fire up there.”

As of 10 p.m. Thursday, the blaze had grown to 10,000 acres and remained just 5 percent contained, the site stated.
The flames, which were largely fueled by timber and grass, were spreading at a moderate-to-rapid rate, according to InciWeb.
The timber fire was particularly challenging for firefighters, who were faced with the threat of entrapment, said Chon Bribiescas of the U.S. Forest Service.
San Bernardino County fire crews described the blaze’s behavior as “erratic” and “extreme.” The fire grew from 100 to 1,000 acres overnight, then to 1,500 by mid-morning. The acreage estimate then quintupled in about three hours.
Evacuations were ordered for 20 to 25 residences off of Rainbow Lane in Onyx Summit, the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department tweeted.
Evacuations were also in effect for several camps, including Camp de Benneville Pines, Camp Ta Ta Pochon, Camp Alpine Meadows, Camp Edwards and Camp Tulakes. Nearly 200 people were impacted by the evacuation orders, according to fire officials.
Children from the summer camps were taken to Citrus Valley High School in Redlands, where they were reunited with their parents.
Structures were also threatened in the area, according to InciWeb.
State Route 38 between Angelus Oaks and Lake Williams was shut down, as was Jenks Lake Road. Motorists were advised to use State Routes 330 and 18 as alternates.
Hiking trails in the San Gorgonio Wildnerness were also closed, and the Pacific Coast Trail was closed from Whitewater Preserve to Onyx Peak. About 1,220 firefighters were battling the flames by air and by land. Resources devoted to the firefight included 88 engines, two air tankers, 10 helicopters, one air attack plane, 28 crews, three water tenders and one dozer.
The blaze began in the midst of a Southern California heat wave which brought hot, dry conditions to the area and prompted the National Weather Service to warn of elevated high fire damage in interior mountain, valley and desert areas.

Temperatures were expected to be hottest Friday through Sunday, when they were forecast to reach into the 90s and low 100s in valley and lower mountain elevations, according to the weather service.
The South Coast Air Quality Management District issued a smoke advisory for the San Bernardino Mountains, instructing people to avoid vigorous activity in the area, among other precautions.
As of Thursday evening, no injuries had been reported in connection with the wildfire.
The cause of the Lake Fire was under investigation.